- Home
- Blog Standard
- Audit
- From Spreadsheets to Systems: A Guide to Automating Audit Support Processes
From Spreadsheets to Systems: A Guide to Automating Audit Support Processes
In the world of audit delivery, spreadsheets have long been the workhorse of support teams. But with increasing engagement complexity, remote collaboration, and staffing challenges, firms are waking up to a difficult truth: manual-heavy processes are no longer sustainable.
⚠️ According to the IFAC 2024 Technology in Audit Survey, over 60% of firms still rely on spreadsheets for key audit support activities—but 85% say these methods are slowing them down.
It’s time to move from spreadsheets to systems—not just for efficiency, but to remain competitive, resilient, and future-ready.
Why Automate Audit Support?
Audit support includes everything from collecting client data and managing PBC (Prepared By Client) lists to generating lead schedules, tracking engagement status, and handling reviewer feedback.
Here’s what automation can solve:
| Audit Support Activity | Current Manual Method | Automated Alternative | Time Saved per Audit |
| PBC List Management | Emails, Excel trackers | Portal-based requests + auto reminders | 3-5 hours |
| Trial Balance Import/Mapping | Manual copy-paste | Smart TB importer with mapping memory | 2-3 hours |
| Lead Schedule Creation | Start from blank Excel template | Auto-generated from mapped TB + templates | 4-6 hours |
| Status Updates & Workflows | Team meetings + spreadsheets | Project management tools (Zoho, Karbon, Monday) | 1-2 hours |
| Review Notes Management | Email, Word comments | Centralised in workflow system (e.g., FYI Docs) | 2-3 hours |
Total potential savings: 12-20 hours per audit, depending on complexity.
Real-World Example: A Mid-Sized UK Firm’s Shift to Systems
Before:
A 30-person firm managing 300 audits a year struggled with:
- Missed client deadlines due to unclear status tracking
- Juniors spending 40% of time on admin (e.g. formatting, version control)
- Poor visibility on bottlenecks
After implementing automation (over 6 months):
- Used Bright Manager for workflows + Zoho for PBC and TB imports
- Created standardised audit templates in Excel with macros
- Introduced dashboard reviews and auto-alerts
Results:
- 30% time reduction in audit support
- 60% drop in email volume related to status checks
- Improved review turnaround time by 40%
What You Can and Cannot Automate
Not everything in audit support can be automated. But knowing what’s fair game helps prioritise effort.
| Can Be Automated | Cannot Be Fully Automated |
| PBC reminders and uploads via client portal | Professional judgment in review |
| Trial balance mapping and schedule generation | Complex reconciliations requiring context |
| Workflow and task status dashboards | Final sign-offs and ethical considerations |
| Staff capacity and timesheet tracking | Conversations with clients around findings |
| Version control, file storage and naming conventions | Contextual feedback from reviewer to preparer |
| Notifications and escalation of overdue tasks | Mentorship, team training, and learning assessments |
Rule of thumb: If it’s repeatable, rule-based, and admin-heavy, it can probably be automated.
The Cost of Staying Manual vs. The Cost of Automating
| Factor | Manual (Spreadsheet-Based) | Automated (System-Based) |
| Time per audit (support tasks) | 20-30 hours | 8-15 hours |
| Staff cost (@ £25/hour) | £500-£750 | £200-£375 |
| Risk of errors | High (versioning, data entry, omissions) | Low (controls, standardisation, alerts) |
| Staff morale | Frustrated by grunt work | Empowered with strategic focus |
| Tech cost | £0 (hidden cost in wasted hours) | £100-£300/month per firm (tool-dependent) |
| Client experience | Inconsistent, unclear deadlines | Streamlined, transparent |
A firm running 300 audits per year could save £90K-£135K annually by automating key audit support tasks, even after tech costs.
The Strategic Payoff
Beyond efficiency, audit automation supports:
- Scalability – take on more audits without adding admin staff
- Staff retention – less burnout, more meaningful work
- Data-driven insight – track bottlenecks, turnaround, utilisation
- Stronger offshore coordination – clear workflows across borders
- Client satisfaction – proactive updates, less email ping-pong
How to Start: A 5-Phase Implementation Blueprint
- Audit your current workflows – identify what’s manual, slow, or repetitive
- Pick one core area to automate – e.g., PBC collection or TB mapping
- Test with a pilot team or engagement – get feedback, refine templates
- Roll out across the firm with training – upskill your team, track adoption
- Measure and improve – track time saved, error reduction, staff feedback
Tip: Start small, systematise fast, and choose tools that integrate well with your existing stack (e.g., Xero, CCH, Bright, Karbon).
Final Thought
Automation isn’t about replacing people, it’s about freeing your team from repetitive admin so they can focus on insight, judgement, and relationship-building. The firms that embrace this mindset shift won’t just do audits faster, they’ll do them smarter, better, and at scale.
Spreadsheets got you here. Systems will take you further.
